Pierce v. Eplett
Petitioner: David A Pierce
Respondent: Cheryl Epleh and Cheryl Eplett
Case Number: 2:2020cv01300
Filed: August 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Cheryl Eplett (Collins, Winn)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCREENING ORDER re #1 Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 10/22/2020. Plaintiff PERMITTED to proceed on specified claims. Copy of Petitioner's Petition and this Order to be electronically SENT to Wisconsin DOJ for service on Respondent; DOJ to NOTIFY Court within 21 days if it will not accept service for Respondent. Within 30 days, Respondent to FILE motion to dismiss or answer petition. IF RESPONDENT FILES ANSWER, briefing to proceed as follows: Petitioner's brief in support of his Petition due within 60 days of filing of Respondent's answer; Respondent's opposition brief due within 60 days of service of Petitioner's brief or 120 days of this Order if Petitioner does not file a brief; Petitioner's reply due within 30 days of filing of Respondent's brief. IF RESPONDENT FILES MOTION, briefing to proceed as follows: Petitioner's brief in opposition due within 30 days of filing of Respondent's motion; Respondent's reply due within 15 days of filing of Petitioner's brief. Civil L. R. 7(f) governs page limitations. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to David A Pierce at Oakhill Correctional Institution) (jm)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by David A Pierce. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(asc)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to petitioner re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (asc)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David A Pierce. (Filing Fee PAID $5 #MK4689083633) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Exhibits, #3 Exhibits, #4 Exhibits, #5 Exhibits, #6 Exhibits, #7 Exhibits, #8 Exhibits, #9 Exhibits)(asc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Eplett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David A Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cheryl Epleh
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cheryl Eplett
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?