Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Akim Brown v. Cheryl Eplett
as 24-1643
Petitioner: AKIM BROWN
Respondent: CHERYL EPLETT, Warden
Harmon v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff: Joshua W Harmon
Defendant: Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, C O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Jones v. Cheryl Eplett
as 24-1398
Applicant: RAYMOND JONES
Respondent: CHERYL EPLETT, Warden
Lee Brown v. Cheryl Eplett, et al
as 24-1248
Plaintiff: LEE A. BROWN
Defendant: CHERYL EPLETT, Warden, EMIL TONEY and JOHN/JANE DOE
Singh v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner: Arshpreet Singh
Respondent: Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kovacic v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: William T Kovacic
Defendant: Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Cassandra Abney, Bethany Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Eplett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner: Donnell Devonte Sanders
Respondent: Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabagua v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff: Mark Daniel Cabagua
Defendant: Warden Cheryl Eplett, Kevin Carr, J Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner: LaMondre Moore
Respondent: Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Eplett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01743
Petitioner: Jeffrey K Walker
Respondent: Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?