Abdel Mawla v. Target Corporation et al
| Mohamed Abdel Mawla |
| Target Corporation and Null Target Corporation |
| 2:2021cv00573 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Mohamed Abdel Mawla. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Ovbiagele, Ohioma) |
| Summons Issued as to Null Target Corporation, Target Corporation. (bx) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha C Huddleston on behalf of Mohamed Abdel Mawla. Attorney(s) appearing: Attorney Samantha Huddleston (Huddleston, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Mohamed Abdel Mawla. (Ovbiagele, Ohioma) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Mohamed Abdel Mawla. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number BWIEDC-3810174) (Attachments: #1 Ex A - Charge of Discrimination, #2 Ex B - Right to Sue Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Ovbiagele, Ohioma) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
