Williams v. Radtke
Michael Williams |
Dylon Radtke |
2:2021cv01066 |
September 13, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Stephen C Dries |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (kah) |
Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Michael Williams. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Rose, Christopher) |
NOTICE of Electronic Filing Error re #3 Consent/Refusal to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge filed by Michael Williams ; This document must contain the name of the assigned magistrate judge (Stephen C. Dries). This document must be RE-FILED; Please refer to the policies and procedures for electronic case filing and the user manual found at www.wied.uscourts.gov (kah) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Dylon Radtke. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Blimling, John) |
NOTICE from the clerk to RESPONDENT requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries be filed within 21 days; the form is available #here. (kah) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John A Blimling on behalf of Dylon Radtke. Attorney(s) appearing: John A. Blimling (Blimling, John) |
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Dylon Radtke (Collins, Winn) |
![]() |
Filing 4 ATTACHMENTS Signature Page to Petition by Michael Williams re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Rose, Christopher) |
Filing 3 TO BE REFILED Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Michael Williams. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Rose, Christopher) Modified on 10/5/2021 (kah). |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Michael Williams. (Rose, Christopher) |
Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Williams. ( Filing Fee PAID $5 receipt number AWIEDC-3918596) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rose, Christopher) Modified on 9/14/2021 (amb). |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Radtke | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Williams | |
Represented By: | Christopher W Rose |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Dylon Radtke | |
Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas |
Represented By: | John A Blimling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.