Hobbs v. Willis et al
| Lawrence Houston Hobbs |
| Nicholas Willis, Alejandro Padilla, Tim Zarzecki, Christopher Smith, Brian Smith, John/ Doe and Mount Pleasant Police Department |
| 2:2022cv00467 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FILING FEE Received: $402.00, receipt number 89666; Service Packet Issued jcl) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/26/2022. #2 Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee DENIED; plaintiff to pay full $402 filing fee by end of day 6/17/2022, failure to pay by deadline may result in dismissal. #3 Plaintiff's motion for leave to file electronically and use certain electronics in the courtroom DENIED. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Lawrence Hobbs)(cb)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order to File Electronically and to Use Certain Electronic Devices in the Courtroom by Lawrence Houston Hobbs. (asc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Lawrence Houston Hobbs. (asc) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Lawrence Houston Hobbs. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(asc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
