Juarez v. Does et al
| David C Juarez |
| Does Odd Number Does, Racine City Clerk, Judge Michael J Piontek and Assistant Attorney David C Rice |
| 2:2023cv01247 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 10/30/2023. By November 20, 2023, plaintiff David C. Juarez shall either pay the full $402 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Juarez's failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of his case. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(mlm)
|
| Docket Annotation; per phone call with plaintiff, he did not receive #2 letter and forms. Re-sent to plaintiff of 10/16/2023. (amb) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to David C. Juarez re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee be filed within 21 days. (mlm) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Does, Michael J Piontek, David C Rice filed by David C Juarez. Jury Demand (mlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
