Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Juarez v. Noonan
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Patric J Noonan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. Racine City Clerk Odd Number Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Racine City Clerk Odd Number Doe, Michael J Piontek and David C Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. Does et al
as 2:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Does Odd Number Does, Racine City Clerk, Judge Michael J Piontek and Assistant Attorney David C Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juarez v. Noonan
as 2:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Patric J Noonan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Juarez v. Sergeant Anderson
as 23-1843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. JUAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT ANDERSON, Racine County Sheriff's Office
Juarez v. Racine County Circuit Court
as 2:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
David C Juarez
Respondent:
Racine County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Juarez et al v. Racine County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
David C Juarez
Respondent:
Racine County Circuit Court and Cpt Bradley Friend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Juarez et al v. Racine County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
David C Juarez
Respondent:
Racine County Circuit Court and Cpt Bradley Friend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Juarez v. Friend et al
as 2:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Bradley Friend and Patric J Noonan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juarez v. Anderson
as 2:2021cv01091
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Sgt Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
