Rowe, Michael v. Trish et al
| Michael Cortez Rowe |
| Trish, Martin, Heinzyl, Jane Doe, Karen Anderson, Hagg, Pitzen, Hooper, Exner, Karna and David Spannagel |
| 3:2014cv00195 |
| March 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying plaintiff's 33 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel; denying plaintiff's 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/13/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying without prejudice plaintiff's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting defendants' 29 Motion for Extension of Time. The parties may have until November 2, 2015, to submit a summary judgment motion that complies with this court's procedures. No further extensions will be granted in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/23/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 2.98 assessed. (Initial partial filing fee due 4/9/2014.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/14/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
