Cases 1 - 10 of 1,848
Gordon v. LA Dept Pub Sfty Corr
as 25-30031
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Tim Hooper, Warden and James M. LeBlanc, Head Director, District Attorney Department
Chandler v. Hooper
as 25-30020
Petitioner:
Charles Chandler
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Wilbert v. Abbott et al
as 6:2025cv00012
Defendant:
Jennifer Humphreys, Amy Gilliam, Ursula Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Wilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. USPS
as 25-10030
Defendant:
Scott Hooper, Louis DeJoy, Kevin Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
Lula Westbrook
Miller v. Hooper
as 2:2025cv14001
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Miller
Defendant:
Jonathan Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hooper
as 24-30809
Petitioner:
Jason Thomas
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ameris Bank v. H and H Constructors, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv02809
Defendant:
Kingsley Hooper and H & H Constructors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barker v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv02934
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barker
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooper v. American Strategic Insurance Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00612
Defendant:
Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc., Timothy K France and American Strategic Insurance Corporation doing business as Progressive Insurance
Plaintiff:
Gregg Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
