Cases 1 - 10 of 1,734
Van Nortrick v. Hooper
as 24-30274
Petitioner:
Roy Van Nortrick
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Johnson v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Saul Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01918
Plaintiff:
David Hooper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Philip Anthony
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Louisiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko and Andrew M. Moore
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Arc Realty LLC
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J Arko and Andrew M Moore
Defendant:
Arc Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Danny Hooper v. Roosevelt Barden
as 24-1783
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Hooper
Defendant:
Roosevelt Barden, Captain Shift Supervisor, EARU
O'Neill v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd P. Headley and others
Miller v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02711
Plaintiff:
Eric Miller
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd P. Headley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
