Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westbrook v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Lula Westbrook
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Kevin Farmer and Scott Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pelko v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
John D Pelko
Respondent:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickey v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Douglas Dickey
Defendant:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper and Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelko v. Stith et al
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pelko and John D Pelko
Defendant:
Judge David Stith, Sheriff J.C. Hooper, Nueces County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Oliver et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams
Defendant:
Lori Oliver, Roy Bailey, Aaron Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelko v. Officer Mixon et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pelko
Defendant:
Officer Mixon, Officer Fielder, Sheriff JC. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sossamon v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Jimmy S. Smith, Christopher Wiedau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yu v. Christmann et al
as 4:2023cv02711
Plaintiff:
Yang-Li Yu
Defendant:
John J. Christmann, IV, Timothy J. Sullivan, Stephen J. Riney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
