Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HOOPER v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2021cv01637
Defendant:
JAYMISON TYLER BENNETT, FRANK VANIHEL and BRANDON ISON
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. HOOPER et al
as 1:2020cv02591
Defendant:
AMY M. JONES, JASON REYOME, RYAN WILSON MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL G. WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. HAGENMAIER et al
as 1:2018cv03654
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, SHANNON LOGSDON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv02625
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, SHANNON LOGSDON, ROBYN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOPER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03882
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
GENE HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOOPER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2016cv00151
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
BRYANT HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOPER v. MOSIER et al
as 1:2016cv01385
Plaintiff:
JACK HOOPER
Defendant:
KEN MOSIER and THE FINER DETAILS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Hooper v. Lain et al
as 2:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Nakehba Hooper
Defendant:
David Lain, John Whidup, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUNSTILL v. BURCH
as 1:2014cv00916
Respondent:
DAVID BURCH, CRIMINAL COURT F25, DAVID M HOOPER and others
Petitioner:
JOSEPH D TUNSTILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANKH EL et al v. HILL et al
as 1:2013cv01471
Defendant:
M. ADDINGTON, ROBERT R. ALTICE, AMY BARBAR and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL and TYREESE TAYLOR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
