Cases 1 - 10 of 764
Magee v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
Covonta Magee
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hays v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Hays
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Richard Burnham
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Richard Burnham
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jacob Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Nortrick v. Hooper
as 24-30274
Petitioner:
Roy Van Nortrick
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Johnson v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Saul Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayer v. Murrill et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Petitioner:
James Grayer
Respondent:
Liz Murrill and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Philip Anthony
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Louisiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sparkman v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Nakeith C Sparkman
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
