Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hooper v. Hogue et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Demetric Lemond Hooper
Defendant:
Tiana Lorissa Robinson-Hogue, Oklahoma City Police Department, BioLife Plasma Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Stitt
as 5:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
JD Hooper
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 5:2022cv00938
Defendant:
Kimberly Yvonne Begay, Hazel R Silverhorn, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Hooper v. Ritchie et al
as 6:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Harold W. Hooper
Defendant:
Jason Ritchie, Jason Alverson, Amber Poindexter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hooper
Defendant:
Luke Pettigrew and Judy Windsor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Branden Shane Harris, Morgan Sanders, Wesley Huff and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Geo, Shawn Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. City of Tulsa, The
as 4:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Justin Hooper
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hooper v. BKD Bradford Village OPCO LLC
as 5:2019cv01156
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Hooper
Defendant:
BKD Bradford Village OPCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper v. Martin
as 6:2019cv00421
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
J.D. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
