Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Hooper v. Hogue et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Demetric Lemond Hooper
Defendant:
Tiana Lorissa Robinson-Hogue, Oklahoma City Police Department, BioLife Plasma Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNamara v. Siegfried et al
as 1:2023cv01820
Defendant:
Francine Mendez, Scott Siegfried, Chris Smith and others
Plaintiff:
John McNamara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Stitt
as 23-6049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J.D. HOOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KEVIN STITT, Governor, State of Oklahoma
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hooper v. Stitt
as 5:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
JD Hooper
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 5:2022cv00938
Defendant:
Kimberly Yvonne Begay, Hazel R Silverhorn, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Hooper v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Linda Hooper
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Hooper v. The City of Tulsa
as 22-5034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN HOOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA
Hooper v. Ritchie et al
as 6:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Harold W. Hooper
Defendant:
Jason Ritchie, Jason Alverson, Amber Poindexter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hooper
Defendant:
Luke Pettigrew and Judy Windsor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
