Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. USA
as 7:2020cv00116
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sylvester Lorenzo Hooper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hooper v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tina Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOOPER v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2019cv01106
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF P.U.R. BOARD, JOHN DOE, M.D., NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Plaintiff:
CLAYBURN HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOPER v. FRIESE et al
as 1:2019cv01031
Defendant:
PHILIP KEVIN BERGER, JEFF HUX, BEVERLY SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. City of Asheville, NC, et al
as 1:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Jai Lateerf Solveig Williams and The Estate of Jai Lateef Solveig Williams
Defendant:
City of Asheville, Kelly Tyler Radford, Tammy Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Hilton
as 5:2018ct03065
Plaintiff:
Travis L'Motte Hooper
Defendant:
Preston B. Hilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Davies et al
as 5:2018ct03056
Plaintiff:
Travis L'Motte Hooper
Defendant:
Joshua Davies, Brunswick County Detention Center and Brunswick County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Wing, et al
as 1:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Liberty Beth Ellis
Defendant:
Jon Wing, Kenny Hipps, Charles S. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. City of Asheville et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Bradford Allen
Defendant:
City of Asheville , Tommy Hooper , Evan Flanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
