Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Miller v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02711
Plaintiff:
Eric Miller
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd P. Headley and others
Lella et al v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Vito Lella and Alex Xenidis
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James Foster, Todd Headley and others
O'Neil v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul O'Neil
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd Headley and others
Hooper v. Cook et al
as 9:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Jordon Hooper
Respondent:
Amy Cook, St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, St. Lawrence County Supreme Court District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Hooper et al
as 9:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Carlos Perez
Defendant:
C.O. Lori Hooper, Sgt. Bernard Stevens, C.O. John Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messina et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06561
Plaintiff:
Joseph Messina, Kaycie Hays, Maxwell Heider and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10473
Plaintiff:
Carl Anderson, Dennis Bakka, Paul Byrne and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Waterman v. Eidos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Suzanne Hooper, William Lis, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Mullen v. Eidos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06337
Defendant:
William Lis, Suzanne Sawochka Hooper, Neil Kumar and others
Plaintiff:
John Mullen
Ciccotelli v. Eidos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10592
Defendant:
Suzanne Hooper, William Lis, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
