Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv05808
Plaintiff:
Audrey Hooper and Audrey Annette Hooper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hooper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv05763
Plaintiff:
Deena Hooper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Berra v. Propp et al
as 2:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Mr Propp, Mr Elsasser, Mrs Denay and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy K Berra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. City of Spokane et al
as 4:2018cv05147
Defendant:
Blaine Kakuda, Thomas Lee, Stephen Garvin and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew S McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anest v. Hooper, et al
as 2:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Justin M Anest
Defendant:
Hooper, Hill and Veloski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper et al v. City Of Seattle, Washington et al
as 2:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hooper , Brandie Osborne , The Episcopal Diocese of Olympia and others
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Washington , Washington State Department of Transportation and Roger Millar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hooper
as 2:2016mc00022
Respondent:
Michael J Hooper
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Hooper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv01511
Plaintiff:
Engrid Hooper
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bergeron v. GIA Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01271
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
GIA Inc, Kevin Smith, Douglas Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
