Davis, James v. Meisner, Michael et al
| James Jermaine Davis |
| Michael Meisner, Sandra Hautamaki, Donald Morgan, David Melby, Lt Karna, Sandra Ashton, Theodore Anderson, Kevin Pitzen, Randy Schneider, Ronald Swensen, Tracy Kophamer, Michael Rataczak and Philip Kerch |
| 3:2015cv00268 |
| May 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dodge |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
ORDER denying plaintiff's renewed 163 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/20/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
160
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing the case. (SLC /PAO) (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 137 Motion to Appear by Video Conference Nikko Krohn and Quenton Thompson. The trial schedule is modified as follows:Final Pretrial Conference: October 16, 2017, at 12:30 p.m.Jury Selection and T rial: October 16, 2017, at 1:00 p.m.Davis and his incarcerated witnesses will appear to testify in the following order: October 16: Davis (in person), Robert Gant (in person) October 17: Nikko Krohn (via video conference), Quenton Thompson (via video conference), Curtis Daniels, Hipolito Claudio Jr. The clerk of court is directed to amend the writs of Daniels and Claudio Jr. to order their appearances on October 17, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/6/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER granting plaintiff James Davis's petitions for writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum for Curtis Daniels (dkt. 108 ), Quenton Thompson (dkt. 109 ) and Robert Gant (dkt. 113 ). Davis's petition for writs of habeas corpus ad testi ficandum for Richard Arnold (dkt. [ 105 ]) and Hipolito Claudio, Jr. ( 106 ) are STAYED until October 5, 2017. Davis's petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for Nikko Krohn (dkt. 107 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/27/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying plaintiff's 99 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/8/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting 92 Motion to postpone the July 31, 2017 trial date. The remainder of the schedule is STRICKEN. Not later than June 23, 2017, the parties must report which dates listed within this order work for them inorder of preference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/8/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER denying defendants' 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying plaintiff's 79 Motion to deny, strike, and sanction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/28/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust; denying without prejudice 45 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel; denying as unnecessary 48 Motion for Leave to File; denying 49 Motion to stay deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/20/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 17 Motion for Use of Release Account Funds. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/28/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 30.14 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 6/4/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Oppeneer on 5/12/2015. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
