Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Head v. Meisner et al
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff: Nigel Head
Defendant: Michael Meisner, Angela Davis and Candace Whitman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. Meisner
as 2:2022cv01453
Petitioner: Juan R Camacho
Respondent: Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spade v. Bolduan et al
as 1:2022cv01324
Plaintiff: Lazarick Spade
Defendant: CO Bolduan, Capt Keller, Dan Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Patterson v. Michael Meisner
as 22-3001
Petitioner / Appellant: BRIAN PATTERSON
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL MEISNER
Laycock v. Meisner et al
as 1:2022cv01246
Plaintiff: Clint Laycock
Defendant: Warden Michael Meisner and Sara Koerner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Meisner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01215
Petitioner: Lanarius Travell Hodges
Respondent: Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv01196
Plaintiff: Nathan Wright and Nathen Wright
Defendant: Kevin A Carr, Warden Michael Meisner, Sara Koerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Meisner
as 2:2022cv01147
Plaintiff: Jared L Spencer and Jared Spencer
Defendant: Kevin A Carr, Michael Meisner, Sara Koerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steinpreis v. Meisner
as 2:2022cv00933
Petitioner: Steven Michael Steinpreis
Respondent: Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitehead v. Plantz et al
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff: Frank T Whitehead
Defendant: Mr Plantz, Mr Waas, Linda Bartow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?