Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Walter Smith v. Sandra Hautamaki, et al
as 21-2004
Defendant / Appellee:
BELINDA SCHRUBBE, BRUCE MURASKI, Captain, MICHAEL THURMER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER SMITH
Solesby-Funmaker v. Hautamaki et al
as 2:2018cv01205
Defendant:
Capt Hoch, David Tarr, Sandra Hautamaki and others
Plaintiff:
Kenno Solesby-Funmaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Walter v. Lind, Beth et al
as 3:2018cv00189
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Beth Lind , Sandra Hautamaki, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Streckenbach v. Meisner et al
as 2:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Streckenbach
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Sandra Hautamaki, David Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Dallet et al
as 2:2016cv01677
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Rebecca F Dallet, Scott Walker, Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, James v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
James Jermaine Davis
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Sandra Hautamaki , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodvine, Christopher v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Michael Dittman , Sandra Hautamaki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Walter v. Lind, Beth et al
as 3:2014cv00796
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Beth Lind , Sandra Hautamaki , Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gidarisingh, Sonniel v. Bittelman, Travis et al
as 3:2012cv00916
Plaintiff:
Sonniel R. Gidarisingh
Defendant:
Travis Bittelman , Millonig, Ricky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laumann v. Raemisch et al
as 2:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nickolas J Laumann
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch , Paul Sumnicht, Charles Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
