Cases 61 - 70 of 740,006
CATALDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06873
Plaintiff:
JASON CATALDO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NORTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06901
Plaintiff:
DENISE NORTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHAFFER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06904
Plaintiff:
ROBIN SHAFFER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BAJDA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06868
Plaintiff:
HEATHER A. BAJDA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MENDEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06878
Plaintiff:
IRMA MENDEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BLAZOVIC v. KEYSTONE SERVICING COMPANY, LLC
as 3:2024cv06893
Plaintiff:
HELENA BLAZOVIC
Defendant:
KEYSTONE SERVICING COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Greenberg et al v. Johnson Controls Inc.
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Greenberg, Christopher Gale, Robert Giza and others
Defendant:
Johnson Controls Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Harrell v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02524
Plaintiff:
Mark Harrell
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC., THE LASH GROUP, LLC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
VU et al v. MAX SERVICES CORP et al
as 5:2024cv02509
Plaintiff:
KIM VU and Andrew Gasser
Defendant:
MAX SERVICES CORP and MARCO A MIRANDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ALLSOP, INC. v. QVC, INC.
as 2:2024cv02516
Plaintiff:
ALLSOP, INC.
Defendant:
QVC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
