Cases 41 - 50 of 77,582
WRIGHT v. JEAFFRESON
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
JOHN CORDY JEAFFRESON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STATE OF FLORIDA v. COTTRELL
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MURNAHAN v. ORANGE COUNTY COURT et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
CHESTER ROBERT MURNAHAN
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY COURT, TED MARRERO, HEATHER NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL and JAMES SKIPPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Burch, Ronald Hue v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv22177
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hue Burch
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Woodside, Rashad v. Miami Residential Reentry Office
as 1:2024cv22171
Plaintiff:
Rashad Woodside
Defendant:
Miami Residential Reentry Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Smith et al.
as 6:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
William Andre Jemel Wright
Defendant:
Officer L. Smith and City of Oviedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Oneal et al
as 6:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Frederick C. Wiggins, Jr
Defendant:
Melavan Oneal and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
