Cases 71 - 80 of 10,321
Vincent v. Mims
as 3:2024cv01340
Petitioner:
Richard A. Vincent
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smock v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Aaron John Smock
Defendant:
Sheriff Dan Daniels, Quinn, Dawley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smock v. Clackamas County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2024cv01339
Defendant:
Clackamas County Sheriffs Office
Plaintiff:
Aaron John Smock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menefee v. Marzelli et al
as 3:2024cv01337
Defendant:
Washington County Jail, Commander Marzelli and Deputy Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
LeAndrew-LaRonn Menefee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2024cv01338
Defendant:
Multnomah County Inverness Jail and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dwayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byzewski v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
Geremy Byzewski
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, J. Stark, Director Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Miller
as 6:2024cv01324
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Petitioner:
William Lamar Burrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Multnomah County, Oregon
as 3:2024cv01320
Petitioner:
Darrell Dwayne Smith
Respondent:
Multnomah County, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01325
Petitioner:
Tayan Jackson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bedford v. WellPath et al
as 6:2024cv01316
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, WellPath, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Bedford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
