Cases 31 - 40 of 10,172
Daniel v. Heredia
as 6:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Dusty Jo Daniel
Defendant:
Deputy Heredia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00858
Petitioner:
Edward Perez
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Godstone v. Pedro et al
as 3:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Merlin Godstone
Defendant:
David Pedro, Christopher Scarr, D Berran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locklear v. S.I.S-Thomas et al
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Buster Locklear
Defendant:
LT. S.I.S-Thomas, LT. Wood, LT. Palermo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Appelt v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Appelt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. USA
as 3:2024cv00843
Petitioner:
Hector Javier Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Osejo v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Enrique Osejo
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eaton v. Reese et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Arnold Eaton
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Colette Peters, All Former Directors of The Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luiz et al v. Arrington et al
as 3:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Denice Shala Joy Luiz and Kameron Biondello
Defendant:
Lisa Arrington, Brenda Blackburn, Nicole Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine v. US. Government Agencies
as 6:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Erskine
Respondent:
US. Government Agencies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
