General Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,732
Kathleen Dorsett v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1881
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN M. DORSETT
Defendant: ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Kaitlyn Cooper Youmans v. Warden SCI Muncy, et al
as 24-1859
Plaintiff: KAITLYN COOPER YOUMANS
Defendant: WARDEN SCI MUNCY and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Matthew Milisits v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff: MATTHEW CHRISTIAN MILISITS
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Ricky Miller, Jr. v. Warden Greene SCI, et al
as 24-1837
Plaintiff: RICKY L. MILLER, JR.
Defendant: WARDEN GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
Jermaine Vaughn v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1822
Plaintiff: JERMAINE VAUGHN
Defendant: ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Dwayne Hill, Jr. v. Warden SCI Brenner, et al
as 24-1829
Plaintiff: DWAYNE HILL, JR.
Defendant: WARDEN SCI BRENNER, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Rando Saavedra-Ramirez v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1738
Plaintiff: RANDO SAAVEDRA-RAMIREZ
Defendant: DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN LORETTO FCI
Raymond David v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1773
Plaintiff: RAYMOND DAVID
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Edgardo Rivera v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1750
Plaintiff: EDGARDO SOBRADO RIVERA
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Russell Grimes v. State of Delaware, et al
as 24-1744
Plaintiff: RUSSELL M. GRIMES
Defendant: STATE OF DELAWARE and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?