Cases 11 - 20 of 3,159
Jackson v. Pitt
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carmela Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
William Brad Pitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Taylor v. Higashi et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Cleofe, Gaga Higashi, Myron T. Higashi, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Shella Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fuller v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Fuller
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Honolulu Police Department, Veronica Sedeno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newman v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Makim Newman
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, County of Kauai and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craig v. Hawaiian Paradise Park Owners Association et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Nicole Craig
Defendant:
Hawaiian Paradise Park Owners Association, Karin Hoffman, Jeffrey Finley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
