Cases 41 - 50 of 601
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. v. 10.79 Acres of Land, Owned by Independent Timber, Inc., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
Defendant:
10.79 Acres of Land, Owned by Independent Timber, Inc., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and 0.85 Acres of Land, Owned by Independent Timber, Inc., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.74 Acres of Land, Owned by Thomas E. Echols, Ronnie W. Echols and Norris E. Echols, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.74 Acres of Land, Owned by Thomas E. Echols, Ronnie W. Echols and Norris E. Echols, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.88 Acres of Land, Owned by June T. Soyars, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.88 Acres of Land, Owned by June T. Soyars, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.96 Acres of Land, Owned by Richard L. Rust and Lori R. Rust
as 4:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.96 Acres of Land, Owned by Richard L. Rust and Lori R. Rust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 7.34 AcresofLand, Owned by LewisOClements,Sr,AnthonyGray,KathyPoindexter,LeanCRobertson,NadineBPerkins,AnthonyBrown,HenryIsaiahNewbill,MarvinNewbill,LaverneNDavis,AliceNDavis,ThomasDouglasClements,Jr
as 7:2022cv00327
Defendant:
7.34 AcresofLand, Owned by LewisOClements,Sr,AnthonyGray,KathyPoindexter,LeanCRobertson,NadineBPerkins,AnthonyBrown,HenryIsaiahNewbill,MarvinNewbill,LaverneNDavis,AliceNDavis,ThomasDouglasClements,Jr, Thomas Clement and Helen Glass
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v.4.56 Acres of Land, Owned by Adam J. Harper, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
4.56 Acres of Land, Owned by Adam J. Harper, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Jerry Robertson Davis, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Jerry Robertson Davis, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
9.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Albert L. Keatts and Ocie Adams Keatts, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.77 Acres of Land, Owned by Malcolm Dale Roach, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 11.86 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald B. Barnhart
as 7:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
11.86 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
