Cases 11 - 20 of 4,235
Smith v. Brazzle et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Andre Charles Brazzle, Andre Charles Brazzle of Brazzle Constable Service and County of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Liu v. Utah State University et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tianbiao Liu
Defendant:
Utah State University, Lance Seefeldt, Laurens Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hulse et al v. American Fork Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephen Hulse and Kalie Jones
Defendant:
American Fork Police Department, RJ Bibeau, FNU Blackbern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kalie Jones and Nicholas Stephen Hulse
Defendant:
Judge Douglas Nielsen, Moody John R., Cleave Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
