Cases 1 - 10 of 609
BHATTARAI v. SHAHI
as 2:2024cv01330
Defendant:
SANDEEP K SHAHI
Plaintiff:
ANU BHATTARAI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
STRADER v. HOME DEPOT
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
VANCE STRADER
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Mehdizadeh v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company
as 2:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mehdizadeh
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE et al v. Isinhue
as 5:2024cv03145
Defendant:
Alexander Isinhue
Plaintiff:
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE and Jane Schubert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
BUCKNER v. STUART BROWN et al
as 2:2024cv00955
Defendant:
BROWN BUSINESS VENTURES LLC and STUART BROWN
Plaintiff:
ASHANTI BUCKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SAMPLE, KELLY J. ROBERTSON, DEREK ARTIM and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRATICO v. GIANNOPOULOS
as 2:2024cv02212
Defendant:
PHILLIP GIANNOPOULOS
Plaintiff:
DOMENICO PRATICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
YANCY-EL v. KELLY et al
as 2:2024cv00751
Defendant:
MICHAEL MOSES, BRIAN KAMAUF, KAREN SANTORO and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA P. YANCY-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
DAVIS-EL v. KELLY et al
as 2:2024cv00741
Defendant:
BRIAN J. RIPPER, KEITH KOVALSKY, SCOTT STEPHENSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUGGIRALA v. TATA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED (TCS)
as 5:2024cv02047
Defendant:
TATA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED (TCS)
Plaintiff:
RAGHU DUGGIRALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
