Cases 11 - 20 of 7,987
HELMS v. DAISY
as 1:2024cv06644
Plaintiff:
JESSE HELMS
Defendant:
MIKE DAISY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWKINS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06629
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAWKINS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. HUTTON et al
as 1:2024cv06563
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PTL. WILLIAM HUTTON, PTL. S. O'HALLORAN, B. FIDUCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06520
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CRAWFORD
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VILLAGRAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06523
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VILLAGRAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. IMAN et al
as 1:2024cv06556
Plaintiff:
LAQUANE CURRY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. IMAN, OFFICER A. VELEZ, SERGEANT M. DEHARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIDD v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv06488
Plaintiff:
DARRIN KIDD, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv06509
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B. CONNER
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRADER v. PRESENZA et al
as 1:2024cv06398
Plaintiff:
SHAWN R. STRADER
Defendant:
LOUIS J. PRESENZA, ERIN YERKE and OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONLEY v. GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv06286
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES DONLEY
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAJOR CRIMES CAMDEN COUNTY and CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
