Cases 1 - 10 of 15,480
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Defendant:
KELVIN WELLS, JEFFREY E LEWIS, W LAPORTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDDICK v. OSBORN et al
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
QUINTON M REDDICK
Defendant:
PAUL OSBORN, KYLE ROWLAND and JAMES COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis, Benjamin v. Cava et al
as 1:2024cv22459
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F. Hollis
Defendant:
Daniella Levine Cava, Moises Ramirez, Julian Comas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
CISNEROS-GONZALEZ v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
JOSE A CISNEROS-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
E HERNANDEZ, ALEJANDRA and ALEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pete v. Sarasota County Corrections
as 8:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Raynard Pete
Defendant:
Sarasota County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funk v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough)
as 8:2024cv01518
Petitioner:
Jason Matthew Funk
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conaway v. Vanelswyk
as 8:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Jermaine R. Conaway
Defendant:
Brice Vanelswyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pete v. Sarasota County Jail
as 8:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Raynard Pete
Defendant:
Sarasota County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Hernando County Detention Center et al
as 8:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Victor Wade Hicks
Defendant:
Hernando County Detention Center and Hernando County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAKENDY v. SUMMERS et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
ALFRED MAKENDY
Defendant:
W SUMMERS, MAJOR CHILDS, T MCCROWSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
