Cases 11 - 20 of 18,969
GARRETT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv04598
Plaintiff:
JACOB TIMOTHY GARRETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS N.J.D.O.C., NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWKINS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06629
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAWKINS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELMS v. DAISY
as 1:2024cv06644
Plaintiff:
JESSE HELMS
Defendant:
MIKE DAISY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06645
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN RAMOS
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOPKINS v. HICKS et al
as 1:2024cv06646
Plaintiff:
AL-QUON HOPKINS
Defendant:
ADM. MARCUS HICKS and NURSE MARSHA LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06520
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CRAWFORD
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONNER v. SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv06509
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B. CONNER
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSSO v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv04555
Petitioner:
28235-078 DAYRUN ALBORNOZ POSSO and DAYRUN ALBORNOZ POSSO
Respondent:
WARDEN and FCI, FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CURRY v. IMAN et al
as 1:2024cv06556
Plaintiff:
LAQUANE CURRY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. IMAN, OFFICER A. VELEZ, SERGEANT M. DEHARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2024cv06549
Petitioner:
AHMAR BUTLER
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
