Cases 11 - 20 of 13,236
FOLEY v. CIGNA GROUP et al
as 1:2024cv06641
Plaintiff:
DENISE FOLEY
Defendant:
CIGNA GROUP, CIGNA HEALTHCARE and HEALTHSPRING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA v. ANGEL'S DRYWALL, INC.
as 3:2024cv06482
Petitioner:
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA
Respondent:
ANGEL'S DRYWALL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
PULIDORE v. ROSELLE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2024cv06484
Plaintiff:
DONALD PULIDORE
Defendant:
ROSELLE BOARD OF EDUCATION and NATHAN L FISHER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
VARGAS v. PARK STREET GOURMET LLC et al
as 2:2024cv06400
Plaintiff:
JOAO VARGAS
Defendant:
PARK STREET GOURMET LLC doing business as SAMBA MONTCLAIR and ILSON GONCALVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
LOOR v. 396 ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv06444
Plaintiff:
MARISOL LOOR
Defendant:
396 ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a NEW LOOK CAR WASH and JEFFREY HAZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BAEZ v. BBZ & SUDDZ DETAILING, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv06431
Plaintiff:
RONNY BAEZ
Defendant:
BBZ & SUDDZ DETAILING, LLC, BUBBZ & SUDDZ PERFORMANCE AUTO SPA, LLC and MICHAEL PODELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RIVERS et al v. ULTIMATE TRANSPORTATION, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv06368
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA RIVERS, TAMIKA ALDRIDGE, CARIEANN KNUCKEN and others
Defendant:
ULTIMATE TRANSPORTATION, LLC and DENNIS LIBERTI
REYES v. WILLIAMS SONOMA INC. et al
as 1:2024cv06359
Plaintiff:
LORENZO REYES
Defendant:
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC., SIMOS INSOURCING SOLUTIONS, INC. and MARK ALIPERTI
GALARZA v. CINCINNATI THERMAL SPRAY, INC.
as 2:2024cv06385
Defendant:
CINCINNATI THERMAL SPRAY, INC. and PEDRO GALARZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
