Cases 1 - 10 of 29,085
Hatter v. DART et al
as 1:2024cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daneka Hatter
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Supt. Cintron, Sgt. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Weekly v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04752
Plaintiff:
London Weekly
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Calamus et al
as 1:2024cv04754
Plaintiff:
Steven Jenkins
Defendant:
Zachary Calamus, Arleta Kochan, Brendan Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50223
Plaintiff:
Justn Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Austin Jr. v. Mason et al
as 1:2024cv04692
Plaintiff:
Dwight Austin Jr.
Defendant:
William Mason, Village of Lansing and Unknown and Unnamed Village of Lansing Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
