Cases 21 - 30 of 8,437
Plambeck v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Arthur Plambeck
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Potts v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Anna Potts
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Potts v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Leona Potts
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pratt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03096
Plaintiff:
Reuben Pratt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pruitt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03097
Plaintiff:
Ernest Pruitt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
Celso Batista Rivera
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Allstar Fire Equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Muoz Serrano v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Victor Muoz Serrano
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Allstar Fire Equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sherrick v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
Johnna Sherrick
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shepherd v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shepherd
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Slater v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Patricia Slater
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
