Cases 31 - 40 of 15,023
Lopez v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Trinidy Lopez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pena v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robin Pena
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kortright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05413
Plaintiff:
Danielle C Kortright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Foley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05411
Plaintiff:
Kerri Ann Foley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05406
Plaintiff:
Heather Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jacaway v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05407
Plaintiff:
Cheri Anne Jacaway
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Flowers v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05055
Plaintiff:
Sam Joseph Flowers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yancey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A Yancey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Linse v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Valerie Joy Linse
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03078
Plaintiff:
Kayla Marie Gonzalez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
