Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California between January 1, 2016 and November 30, 2016
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,146
Dougherty v. Guild Mortgage Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02909
Plaintiff: Kevin G. Dougherty
Defendant: Guild Mortgage Company
Intervenor: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Frausto v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02900
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Frausto
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02905
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al
as 3:2016cv02907
Plaintiff: Ty Sanders
Defendant: Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gottesman v. Santana et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02902
Plaintiff: Eric Gottesman
Defendant: Carlos Santana, Santana Management, Michael Vrionis and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Staton v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2016cv02906
Plaintiff: George Staton
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sirchia v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv02908
Plaintiff: Michael Sirchia
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luminence, LLC v. Aziatec Inc
as 3:2016cv02898
Plaintiff: Luminence, LLC
Defendant: Aziatec Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Harper v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02892
Plaintiff: Tatiana Harper
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02899
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?