Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 12,484
Walter Allen v. U.S. White House
as 24-5099
Plaintiff: Walter L. Allen
Defendant: U.S. White House
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ARAB STUDENT UNION OF JACKSONREED HIGH SCHOOL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01195
Plaintiff: ARAB STUDENT UNION OF JACKSONREED HIGH SCHOOL
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and SAH BROWN
Petitioner: EDNA FRIEDBERG, JENNIFER KNOLL, JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF GREATER WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TACCINO et al v. WREN et al
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff: WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER WREN, MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTIE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, INC. v. BONTA
as 1:2024cv01533
Plaintiff: AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant: ROB BONTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PLASTICS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. BONTA
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff: Plastics Industry Association, Inc.
Defendant: ROB BONTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01529
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Keisha Hurst v. Adrianne Todman
as 24-5139
Plaintiff: Keisha M. Hurst
Defendant: Adrianne Todman, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5140
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Matthew Jones v. Central District Station
as 24-7083
Plaintiff: Matthew Jones
Defendant: Central District Station

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?