Cases 161 - 170 of 426
DIRECTV, LLC v. Kaluger et al
as 5:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Nick E Kaluger and Basement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DIRECTV, LLC v. Dickens, II et al
as 5:2013cv01124
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
James R Dickens, II, Chris M Dickens and Family Restaurant Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. KSD, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00951
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
KSD, Inc. and Kypros Diacou
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
DIRECTV, LLC v. Hilton
as 1:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Ronda Hilton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
DIRECTV, LLC v. Koons et al
as 3:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Sherri L Koons, Thomas L Koons and Powerhouse Pizza, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DIRECTV, LLC v. Bashore et al
as 3:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Tracy R Bashore, Marjorie E North , Mary E North and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Havens
as 2:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael C. Havens
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mata et al
as 3:2012cv03082
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Olivia V. Mata and Angel's Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Flanagan
as 2:2012cv01171
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sean T. Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Filing Error
as 1:2012cv02974
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
David A. Thomas, Jr. and TSBG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
