Cases 131 - 140 of 1,058
Mike Hughes Architects, P.C. v Henning Paric Commercial, LLC
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Henning Paric Commercial, LLC and Mike Hughes Architect, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Mike Hughes Architects, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eckerd v. SSC North America LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00661
Defendant:
Jerod Shelby, SSC North America LLC and Marcus Mosley
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Eckerd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruna et al v. Gates et al
as 4:2020cv00628
Defendant:
RNB Holdings LLC, Cogent Medical Laboratory LLC and Robert Edwin Gates
Plaintiff:
Dustin Rogge, Kellen Sherlock, Pete Sherlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Airgas USA, LLC v John Zink Company, LLC
as 4:2020cv00605
Plaintiff:
Airgas USA, LLC
Defendant:
John Zink Company, LLC doing business as John Zink Hamworthy Combustion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New Dominion, LLC v. H&P Investments, LLC
as 4:2020cv00592
Defendant:
H&P Investments, LLC
Plaintiff:
New Dominion, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C. v. Great Plains Technical Services Inc.
as 4:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Great Plains Technical Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
ONEOK Rockies Midstream, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lackey v. Paypal Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00574
Plaintiff:
John David Lackey
Defendant:
Paypal Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of Commerce v. Equity Bank
as 4:2020cv00557
Plaintiff:
Bank of Commerce
Defendant:
Equity Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MVP Terminalling, LLC v. McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00549
Defendant:
McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MVP Terminalling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duff v. Equifax et al
as 4:2020cv00504
Defendant:
CBC Innovis, U.S. Dept of Education, FICO and others
Plaintiff:
Lorilee Duff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
