Cases 51 - 60 of 16,566
Evans v. O'Connor et al
as 3:2024cv50241
Plaintiff:
Linda Evans
Defendant:
Mike O'Connor, Carpenter Place, Winnebago Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoskins v. Thielen et al
as 3:2024cv50242
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Dallas Thielen, Andrea Tack, Ms. Chess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fears v. Agredano et al
as 1:2024cv05101
Plaintiff:
Jerome Fears
Defendant:
Elias Agredano and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Covey et al
as 1:2024cv05105
Plaintiff:
Jaqwon Hill
Defendant:
Ian Covey and Village of Midlothian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Link v. City of Granite City
as 3:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Kevin Link
Defendant:
City of Granite City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Law v. Stott et al
as 3:2024cv50235
Plaintiff:
Reid B. Law
Defendant:
Greg Stott, Juliene McCormick, Renee Pritchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isom Jr. et al v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2024cv03236
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Isom Jr., Elite Clientele LLC and Isom and Sole Inc.
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Mayor Tiffany Henyard, Inspector Kim Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michalowicz v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Inc.
as 1:2024cv05026
Plaintiff:
Catherine Michalowicz
Defendant:
Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Inc. d/b/a AdventHealth Bolingbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Marcure v. Chenyeon
as 3:2024cv03157
Plaintiff:
Brannen C Marcure
Defendant:
Jasper Chenyeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
