Cases 31 - 40 of 384,856
J.G. v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2024cv04978
Plaintiff:
J.G.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and NYPD Police Officers JOHN DOES 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORAN v. New Tomo Sushi 642 Inc. d/b/a Tomo Japanese Cuisine et al
as 7:2024cv04963
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO VIADA MORAN
Defendant:
New Tomo Sushi 642 Inc. d/b/a Tomo Japanese Cuisine and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Viada Moran v. NEW TOMO SUSHI 642 INC. D/B/A TOMO JAPANESE CUISINE et al
as 7:2024cv04966
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Viada Moran
Defendant:
NEW TOMO SUSHI 642 INC. D/B/A TOMO JAPANESE CUISINE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 636 Jurisdiction and Power of Magistrate Judges
VIADA MORAN v. NEW TOMO SUSHI 642 INC. D/B/A TOMO JAPANESE CUISINE et al
as 7:2024cv04964
Petitioner:
Eduardo VIADA MORAN
Defendant:
NEW TOMO SUSHI 642 INC. D/B/A TOMO JAPANESE CUISINE and John Does
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv04975
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv04972
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings,LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv04980
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings,LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv04969
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv04971
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv04973
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 holdings, LLC
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
