Cases 11 - 20 of 249
Donald Williams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13457
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD O. WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Donald O. Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 23-13565
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD O. WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ronald Knight v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13523
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD KNIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Michael Sockwell v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 23-13321
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL SOCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Michael Duane Zack, III v. Governor of the State of Florida, et al
as 23-13021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and others
Charles Grover Brant v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13124
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES GROVER BRANT
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Michael Wayne Reynolds v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-14015
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE REYNOLDS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dorian O'Kelley v. Warden GDP
as 23-12947
Petitioner / Appellant:
DORIAN FRANK O'KELLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Richard Sealey v. Warden Georgia Diagnostic Prison
as 22-11040
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L SEALEY
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Timothy Boyle v. Warden, Holman CF, et al
as 23-11073
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT BOYLE
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
