Cases 41 - 50 of 19,385
Scott v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv03964
Defendant:
Major Akie, Sheriff Melody Maddox, Sergeant Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
James Eldridge Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Wiggins et al
as 3:2024cv00161
Defendant:
Investigator Jaminson Troutt and Investigator Brandon Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Alzafas Alonzo Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valenzuela v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03944
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Paola Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tate v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv03945
Petitioner:
Dustin Wade Tate
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolbert v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00158
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Petitioner:
Demarctrie L. Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riley v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00159
Respondent:
Sheriff B. Babb
Petitioner:
Christopher Anthony Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambers v. Rodrigiez et al
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Alvin S. Chambers
Defendant:
Floyd County Sheriff and Officer Rodrigiez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. FBI Dickson et al
as 1:2024cv03946
Defendant:
Croford, Brian Dickerson, FBI Dickson and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Wietelman et al
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
KAELYNE YUMUL WIETELMAN and JASON A. LEVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollowell v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03924
Petitioner:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
