Cases 51 - 60 of 15,251
Eric Hernandez v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 24-11710
Plaintiff:
ERIC P. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER
Afaf Malak v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11728
Plaintiff:
AFAF MALAK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Franklin v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv22027
Plaintiff:
Lori L Franklin
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARTLIDGE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Scott William Cartlidge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Addison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv14166
Plaintiff:
Graham Christopher Addison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bisson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Rory Bisson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sands v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Matthew Trent Sands
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ADAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
KORVETTE ADAMS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
MAHONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MAHONE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Porter Jr. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02286
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Porter Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
