Cases 1 - 10 of 80
O'CULL v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. O'CULL
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MARY ELLEN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PIPER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2009cv00506
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER A PIPER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KINSEY v. DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE et al
as 1:2009cv00488
Plaintiff:
ELISE M KINSEY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GORDON v. HAURBRICK et al
as 1:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Defendant:
MARGARET HAURBRICK and DAVID BOSLEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SEARCY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
EDGAR SEARCY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GOULD v. NEWPORT NEWS et al
as 1:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
KELVIN GOULD
Defendant:
NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA CIRCUIT COURT, OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LANCELLOTTI v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv02179
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEPHEN LANCELLOTTI
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, AGENT TO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHEPHARD v. POPE et al
as 1:2008cv02125
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
SHIRLEY POPE, JOHN WILLAMOWSKI, TODD BOOKS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GORE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv02072
Plaintiff:
ANDRE GORE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and SHEDRICK ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HELM et al v. CRIST et al
as 1:2008cv01996
Plaintiff:
MCARTHRU HELM, MICHAEL HUTCHISON, WILLIAM EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
CHARLIE CRIST, WALTER MCNEIL, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
