Cases 91 - 100 of 19,019
GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06507
Petitioner:
JOHN GUNTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TORRES v. JOHN DOE 1-3
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. TORRES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06483
Petitioner:
TALEAF GUNTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SAUZO v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04545
Petitioner:
CARLOS SAUZO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv06504
Petitioner:
KENT BELL
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE FRANCIS A. MCGROGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PISCIOTTA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04470
Petitioner:
VINCENT PISCIOTTA
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEREZ v. MERENDINO
as 1:2024cv06508
Petitioner:
MARCO PEREZ
Respondent:
STEVEN MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KIDD v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv06488
Plaintiff:
DARRIN KIDD, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
