Cases 71 - 80 of 1,393
Craig Henson v. Pharrell Williams
as 23-1926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG M. HENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PHARRELL WILLIAMS, SOMETHING IN THE WATER LLC, BWG LIVE and others
Christina Brown v. Amazon Headquarters, LLC
as 23-1921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON HEADQUARTERS, LLC, a/k/a Amazon.com, Inc. and AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC.
James Nanney v. David Boyle
as 23-6852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DAVID NANNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BOYLE, Counsel of Record
M.P. v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M.P., a minor, by and through, Jennifer Pinckney, as Parent, Natural Guardian, and Next Friend
Defendant / Appellee:
META PLATFORMS INC., f/k/a Facebook, Inc., f/k/a Facebook Payments Inc., f/k/a Facebook Technologies LLC, f/k/a Instagram, LLC, f/k/a Siculus Inc., f/k/a Facebook Holdings LLC, INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC, a/k/a Mediasintez llc, a/k/a Glavset LLC, a/k/a Mixinfo LLC, a/k/a Azimut LLC, a/k/a Novinfo LLC, CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC and others
Debbie Baldwin v. US
as 23-1864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBBIE BALDWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sharon Williams v. WMATA
as 23-1831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Wondell Timmons, Jr. v. Willie Ryles
as 23-1817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WONDELL TIMMONS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIE NELSON RYLES
Merly Champagne v. COFM OPCO LLC
as 23-1820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERLY GARCIA CHAMPAGNE
Defendant / Appellee:
COFM OPCO LLC, d/b/a Cooks Flea Market
Ernest Chappell v. TruckPro, LLC
as 23-1784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST CHAPPELL, Individually, and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher Lee Chappell
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUCKPRO, LLC
Samuel Lyons v. Ileen Ticer Greene
as 23-1759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL A. LYONS
Defendant / Appellee:
ILEEN M. TICER GREENE, Former Lead Counsel for PMA Indemnity Insurance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
