Cases 101 - 110 of 44,924
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv04801
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steffan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Huaco v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50225
Petitioner:
Alberto Canales Huaco
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morris v. Borwick et al
as 3:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Barry Morris
Defendant:
John Borwick, Wexford Health Sources Inc, P. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01209
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jasso v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04101
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Jasso
Defendant:
Roy Little, Alexander Stuart, Jamar A Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galmore v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Kelton Galmore
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, Aaron Conard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slavin v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv04742
Plaintiff:
Edward Slavin
Defendant:
Latoya Ja'Nae Hughes, James Keller and Jennifer Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Tadelman
as 1:2024cv04732
Plaintiff:
Mario Dotson
Defendant:
Sheriff Robb Tadelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States of America v. Rossini
as 1:2024cv04798
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Albert Rossini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner:
Barry Chester Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
