Cases 171 - 180 of 1,664
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Guler v. Crypto Traders Management, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Janine M. Cutting, Lake View Trust, Crypto Traders Fund, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Alper Guler
Guler v. Crypto Traders Management, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Lake View Trust, Does 1-20, Crypto Traders Fund, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Alper Guler
Davison v. NetCredit Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Roger Davison
Defendant:
NetCredit Loan Services, LLC d/b/a NetCredit
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Crypto Traders Management, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00103
Defendant:
Janine M. Cutting, Lake View Trust, Tyson Trust and others
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Snake River Waterkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Scott Spellmon and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Plaintiff:
Snake River Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. P4 Production, LLC
as 4:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation
Defendant:
P4 Production LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
United States of America et al v. P4 Production LLC
as 4:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
State of Idaho, United States of America and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation
Defendant:
P4 Production LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
